Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Environmental Impacts of Household Size, Bringing Family Planning Outside the Health Sector

What are the environmental implications of changing household sizes? A recent article by Mason Bradbury, M. Nils Peterson, and Jianguo Liu, published in Population and Environment, analyzes data from 213 countries over 400 years and finds the average number of occupants per home tends to decline as population grows. This dynamic, they write, indicates that accommodating housing could prove to be one of “the greatest environmental challenges of the twenty-first century.” As countries develop and urbanize, “according to convergence theory, household size decreases (often from greater than five to less than three).” Other cultural shifts, like increasing divorce rates, urban sprawl driven by rising affluence, decreasing numbers of multigenerational households, and larger houses (in the United States, homes more than doubled in size between 1950 and 2002, according to the article) compound the issue. As population growth continues in parts of the world, these trends pose critical questions for conservation and environmental sustainability, since “households are the end consumers of most natural resources and ecosystem services.”

Development initiatives aimed at improving access to contraceptives are largely limited to health sectors, but FHI 360’s Integrating Family Planning into Other Development Sectors suggests ways to integrate these efforts into environmental, agricultural, and financial interventions too.

See full Article: http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2014/03/reading-radar-environmental-impacts-household-size-bringing-family-planning-health-sector/